mfro 4 hours ago

I love Technitium DNS and have run it for several years now. Thanks for the contributions.

avhception 19 hours ago

When I read "PDNS", I will probably always think "PowerDNS".

  • feldrim 17 hours ago

    Yes. That's why I put the footnote there.

    • avhception 16 hours ago

      Well, I read that footnote, but I'm not sure if overloading the acronym is the best idea, is what I'm trying to say.

      • feldrim 15 hours ago

        I agree with you there. But the term does not belong to me buy yo CISA and other organisations. But it's not as bad as Cyber Security Awareness Month acronym at least

Milpotel 18 hours ago

Don't get too exited - Technitium has a bus factor of one, a very small user base and no previous auditing.

  • johnea 6 hours ago

    Yea, I often wonder when I see this type of article, why don't they just use bind9?

    No other DNS resolver is going to come close to it's number of deployment*years in operation.

    I didn't read the article though, since I'm not going to enable javasript and cookies just to read someone's blag post 8-/

    HTML much?

    • feldrim 5 hours ago

      The only problem there is for GDPR consent thingy. You can disable and proceed. I don't use any telemetry except for the consent banners.

      When it comes to Technitium, well, it's written in the blog.

  • esseph 17 hours ago

    And yet here I am deploying it in production

    • Milpotel 14 hours ago

      You are a brave fellow!

feldrim 19 hours ago

I've played with threat intelligence to build a simple, on premises PDNS out of a privacy-focused DNS server.