gtirloni an hour ago

This looks amazing. I find Mermaid.js ugly and the syntax difficult/buggy but unfortunately it's one of the best supported diagram tools in static site generators. It'd be awesome to have Isoflow diagrams embedded in Markdown like that.

  • cybrox an hour ago

    I love the idea of mermaid but the syntax is somewhat convolutes and the integrations in tools like GitLab are very unstable.

  • mgoetzke 23 minutes ago

    Markdown integration would be really great.

  • x0z 44 minutes ago

    Thanks! That'd definitely be interesting to look into, I'll put it on my TODO

mmastrac 2 hours ago

This is awesome. I built a lightweight home status server called Stylus that would probably pair very well with this:

https://github.com/mmastrac/stylus

It works by automatically changing CSS classes, and it looks like the underlying isoflow library should support this.

pjbk 3 hours ago

I always loved the isometric diagrams on Clive Maxfield's [1] books about electronics. Since a lot of circuits are non-planar (flip flops, semiconductor layers, FPGA architecture), adding a perspective view makes things uncluttered, and easier to understand and remember. I think it translates well to many technologies.

[1] https://www.clivemaxfield.com

b0a04gl 21 minutes ago

what if we can make these diagrams synchronized with reality. you need the diagram to pull from the same source of truth as your actual infrastructure - whether that's terraform state, kubernetes manifests, or service discovery. that way diagrams become less historical artifacts and more of living documentation

  • x0z 18 minutes ago

    That's a great thought, I'd need to make some kind of translation between manifests and the json, getting knowledge of those relationships might be tricky? Service discovery is another route, would hate to get someones IT department angry for aggressive port scanning though lol

wooptoo 23 minutes ago

There's also diagrams.mingrammer.com which is a fantastic tool.

donatj an hour ago

I am unclear exactly, what is this doing on top of Isoflow? Seems like Isoflow is doing a lot of the heavy lifting here?

  • x0z 17 minutes ago

    No you're absolutely right, isoflow is doing 90% of the work here, I'm not hiding that, they just don't have a ready to use version like this of their community pack. That's all this is.

Yesman85 43 minutes ago

If it can consume terraform state and visualize it, that would be amazing.

martypitt 6 hours ago

Diagrams look great - well done.

Reminds me of a similar project years ago that was doing the same thing - they ultimately struggled with monetization and folded (I forget the name) -- however this one is MIT OSS, so I'm guessing that's not a key concern right now.

Note that your "Built with the Isoflow library" link at the bottom to isoflow 404's to https://github.com/isoflow/isoflow

  • x0z 6 hours ago

    Thanks! I can't take any credit at all for the icons/design that's all Isoflow, but their community edition is designed to steer you to the pro version.

    No plans at all for money making, just want people to enjoy using it.

    Thank you for pointing out the link, I'll get on that ;)

    • busssard 2 hours ago

      it would be great to have an easier time to add my custom icon svg or even links to svg and then scaling them automatically to size

      this way i could tell the LLM that will be generating my JSON to include the following links as X and create the output JSON immediately

x0z 9 hours ago

I've not done anything special here, just wrapped the community edition of ISOFLOW https://github.com/markmanx/isoflow and made it dead easy to set up and run. You can now export and load JSON backups of your diagrams allowing you to essentially have as many as you want, which the community version of ISOFLOW restricts. Enjoy!

  • lovelearning an hour ago

    I'm not very familiar with Node.js. Any idea where in isoflow's code are the graphics for those 3D-style icons? Are they SVG or what? Is it possible to add custom icons?

zero0529 4 hours ago

Can you export to other formats than JSON?

  • x0z 3 hours ago

    Which formats would you like to see?

    • typeofhuman 3 hours ago

      Not OC but I'd like iage (png/jpg)

progx 3 hours ago

Node version? Could not get it running with 22 or 24 on linux.

  • BigJ1211 2 hours ago

    Works on 24.3.0 for me, though many a warning is thrown.

  • pelagicAustral 2 hours ago

    Got it working with no issues on v20.11.0

    • x0z 2 hours ago

      Good to know! Thanks :)

  • x0z 2 hours ago

    24.3 for me, whats the issue you're getting?

h1fra 2 hours ago

NB: it's using isoflow

9dev 3 hours ago

This is a little tangential, but I've wondered for a while if there's a better way to visualise the composition of software systems.

Often, there's not only a single way to look at one: There's a user interaction flow through components, but those components also consist of hardware; the hardware might be virtual and composed of several, spread, sub-components, or even containers. You can go down this path pretty deep, and arrive at several different representations of the system that are either impossible to visualise at the same time, or make it incomprehensible.

Ideally, I would want to have a way to document different facets of the system individually, but linked to each other, and be able to change my perspective at anytime. This would allow to flip between UX, network traffic, firewall boundaries, program flow, logical RPC flow, and so on; all while being able to view connected components for a given component at anytime. For example, inspecting an application, then viewing its network ports, then its runtime container, the hypervisor the container runs on, the cloud provider that sits in, and so on.

My idea so far is a graph database that contains all components and the edges between them. The tool would have to be as extensible as possible, so using something like HCL to describe the graph would be great, with extensions for all kinds of components and edges. And finally a viewer to render visual representations of one or more composable layers to flick through, and export etc.

I never got around to working on it yet, but if anyone else had the same idea, I'd be open to collaborating :)

  • alixanderwang 3 hours ago

    At least for the layering + using text aspect, D2 support this:

    defining diagrams as multiple layers like so

      x -> y
    
      layers: {
        inside_x: {
          a -> b
        }
      }
    
    A fleshed out example hosted on our web service: https://app.terrastruct.com/diagrams/664641071
    • 9dev an hour ago

      Terrastruct looks really nice, and kind of like a 2D version of the 3D thing I'm thinking of; if you could attach key-value properties to nodes and vertices, and had different rendering modes that made use of any of these properties to render the item differently, that would probably be pretty close. For example, a layer that displays a physical network might only consider vertices with a `kind` attribute of "physical link"; that limits the layer to all nodes with a matching vertex between them, and the layer would also only display those attributes of the nodes relevant for the current view.

      Does that make sense?

      • alixanderwang an hour ago

        Yeah we do this with globs.

          a.class: backend
          b.class: frontend
        
          # hide everything
          **: suspend
        
          layers: {
             backend: {
               # show backend stuff
               **: unsuspend {
                 &class: backend
               }
             }
          }
        
        
        see more here: https://d2lang.com/blog/c4/
    • nullify88 an hour ago

      Whoa as an infrastructure guy I had always dreamed of diagrams like this. And while I've used Miro and some OSS homebrew stuff, nothing was as polished as this. Well done.

    • aitchnyu 2 hours ago

      Wonder why Mermaid has more hype than this.

  • billyp-rva 3 hours ago

    There are quite a few tools that offer this model-based approach; you define your resources in a model, then use them in multiple perspectives to show different aspects like you describe. Some, like Ilograph[0] (my project), offer interactivity and zooming.

    [0] https://www.ilograph.com

  • x0z 3 hours ago

    Some very good points, I totally agree, I suppose as you said you get to a point in your abstraction where it either loses meaning or becomes too complex to view. I think it would be a fantastic thing to try! Go build it!

dr_kretyn an hour ago

"beautiful" here is definitely subjective. I only see a diagram and it looks like from PowerPoint presentation from the marketing team to the sales team.

Why JS world frequently uses "beautiful" or "modern" to describe its project? Often that hides something else.

  • swalsh an hour ago

    You can just not post if your criticism is mean spirited.